Sawbones Spout Climate Change Claptrap

The medical establishment has been captured by the globalists. Check out this headline from an article that appeared in my email from the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): “Critical Care Physician Takes on Climate Change in New World Health Organization Role.” In the 1970s I can remember climate scare tactics being applied but back then we were supposedly headed for a new ice age by the turn of the century. Then they decided the problem was global warming. After several years of cooling occurred they changed the name to climate change. These climate hysterics are shameless but persistent. Here is a small snippet from the climate change JAMA article:

“This June, the World Health Organization (WHO) appointed Kerry its first-ever Director-General Special Envoy for Climate Change and Health. ‘The climate crisis is a health crisis,’ she said in a recent video interview with JAMA, in which she spoke about the rapidly escalating threat that climate change poses to human health—and the opportunity the health care sector has to change course.”

To “change course.” In other words, allow us to direct you from the top down. These court intellectuals claim that hydrocarbon emissions from the use of fossil fuels are poised to harm the planet, and thus mankind unless we take drastic measures now (like adopt EVs on a large scale). Meanwhile, climate related deaths have been on a steady decline since the 1930s, largely due to the extensive use of these same hydrocarbons. And many of the same activists that claim to be so fearful of carbon emissions are also opposed to nuclear energy, which produces no carbon emissions. I smell a rat.

The climate change scam is not about saving the planet; it’s about exerting more power and control over people. One way to exert more control is to limit people’s mobility. I can fill the tank of my car with gas in five minutes and drive it for almost 500 miles without stopping. An electric vehicle will take hours to charge and may go half that far under ideal conditions. Furthermore, you must beef up the electrical system in your home. According to Kentucky congressman and electrical engineer Thomas Massie, the typical two car family converting to EVs will be running the equivalent of 25 extra refrigerators. How will all that extra electricity be generated? Surely some will be powered by natural gas or coal. And how will all the metals that go into those EV batteries be mined? With large caterpillars that burn diesel fuel. Also, EVs are much more expensive. I can buy a used vehicle with a gas engine for 20k, drive it for 100,000 miles and then sell it for 5k. My cost for the vehicle alone has been $15,000 for 100,000 miles; that’s fifteen cents per mile. I can push a gas engine to 200,000 miles or more. The EV will be done at 100,000 miles. The average cost of a new gas powered engine car is about $35,000 vs. the EVs $50,000 average new car cost. These cars are mainly owned by the virtue-signaling parasitic elites while the productive working folks are forced to subsidize it via taxation or inflation (the printing press).

So fewer people will be able to afford a car if we convert to only electric vehicles. That’s not a bug but a feature if you want to control people. The globalist elites have also introduced the concept of “15 minute cities.” The idea is to have these city dwellers be within a 15 minute walk to all they need: groceries, hardware store, clothing shops, restaurants, movie theaters, etc. The image of a hamster running on a wheel comes to mind. Less mobility for the masses; more control for the elites. People need to wake up to what’s occuring in slow motion in front of them and complain now before it’s too late. Your internal combustion engine has been marked for extinction and with it the mobility it brings. The vaccine passports and lockdowns during the covid hysteria had the same effect of limiting mobility and enhancing government control. It wasn’t about protecting your health and it isn’t about saving the planet. As popular radio personality Earl Pitts used to say: “Wake up America!”

Elon Musk’s Tesla has spent billions installing EV charging stations in 48 states. One such station is located about half-way between Los Angeles and San Francisco and is named the Harris Ranch Supercharger Station. It contains 98 charging units. However, if all 98 units were being used at the same time it would take down the local electrical grid- blackout city. But do not despair. What rides in to save the day but, wait for it… diesel powered generators. These generators are operating under less strict emissions standards than, wait for it… gas powered cars. “Green” electric vehicles are a scam folks, intended to redistribute wealth to the likes of Elon Musk, while at the same time draining resources from you and me and making transportation more expensive. Another goal of the elites is to eliminate the middle class. Poor people are easier to control due to fewer resources to command. Upper class, lower class, and nothing in the middle. You could call it neo-feudalism for the modern age. As one World Economic Forum spokesman said “You will own nothing and you will like it.” That’s the plan.

We can punch back or continue to be the punching bag. Find ways to become more self-sufficient so that you can say “no” when the next wave of tyranny arrives- and it will. If enough people say no we will win. Their plans depend on enough people just going along to get along. That is a crucial point so I’ll say it again. Their plans depend on enough people just going along to get along. During the height of the covid hysteria in October 2020 I was proud to gather with many freedom-minded people at a Mises Institute event at Jekyll Island Georgia. At a time when the whole world was masked we all attended the event for three days and there was not a mask to be found. Not one. Were we being needlessly reckless? No. We knew what most did not; masks don’t prevent acquiring or passing respiratory viruses. That very knowledge had been the position of the CDC until covid. The CDC changed their position based not on “the science” but for political expediency. The goal was not to protect but to frighten. Paniced people were more likely to take the “vaccines” and submit to vaccine passports or lockdown orders.

Note: I used “vaccines” rather than vaccines because in the past everyone understood that a vaccine is supposed to prevent you from getting and passing along a disease. The covid “vaccines” did neither. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine just as they had changed the “science” about masking. Not to inform but to deceive. All this legerdemain would not have been possible without the regime’s willing mouthpieces in the legacy media and censorship in the new social media. Thanks to recent revelations such as the “Twitter files” we know that government entities colluded with social media during the covid hysteria to suppress dissident voices, in clear violation of the First Amendment.

Now back to the idea of resistance. As I drove home from the office one day during the covid hysteria in 2020 I stopped at a local Publix to get groceries. I was the only person in the store not wearing a mask. I knew the masks did not work because I had found respiratory virus experts from big name universities such as Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford who were willing to tell the truth. Not all the doctors were lying, just the official government experts. Not one person challenged me as I walked through the store wearing my scrubs and NOT wearing a mask. My point was to display passive resistance. You don’t have to show up at city hall with a pitchfork; simply don’t go along with the tyranny. If enough people resist they are powerless to stop us. They can’t throw everybody in jail. Passive resistance by a few can lead to passive resistance by the many and the cancelling of policies that curtail civil liberties. We have the numbers but we can’t act as clay in their hands.

Arm yourself with the knowledge you need by NOT believing anything the legacy media tells you. You can’t trust CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, Wikipedia, the Google search engine, your local network affiliate news, facebook, or instagram. Instead, get your news from lewrockwell.com, mises.org, or antiwar.com. Sign up for the Tom Woods newsletter at tomwoods.com. Use the Yandex search engine, encyclosearch.org rather than wikipedia.

Remove your kids from the left-wing indoctrination camps called public schools. They are instructing such balderdash as there are multiple genders, white people are oppressors, and we live in a white supremacist country. Find an alternative such as home schooling with the Ron Paul Home School (ronpaulhomeschool.com). Tom Woods did the history portion of that curriculum. He is one of the good guys and has a B.S. in history from Harvard and a PhD in history from Columbia. You will not find a better history teacher anywhere. The Ron Paul Homeschool not only teaches a more nuanced version of history, but teaches public speaking, how to start your own online business, and how to be an entrepreneur. In other words, it teaches students how to be independent financially and intellectually. We must stop supporting institutions that hate us. And yes, take them to church so they can learn there is a higher power than the State. Religion acts as another power center; that’s why they hate it just as the former Soviet Union hated it. That’s why the regime was so insistent on shutting down churches during the covid hysteria. It’s not about public health or saving the planet. It is about control. But be careful when choosing a church because even some of the religious institutions have been infiltrated by left-wing ideologues. I was in Memphis last year and saw the following message on a banner on the lawn of a church with the First United Methodist Church logo on it: “End Racism.” If your church is teaching race politics rather than the gospel, it is time to find another church.

During the covid hysteria many workers had to choose between keeping their jobs and taking the “vaccine.” How can you avoid future tyranny in the workplace? You can start your own business or learn a new skill that will allow you to earn from home. Start a side gig. Work for a smaller company who may be less likely than larger ones to succumb to the woke madness. Stop borrowing money to make consumer purchases such as cars. Save enough money to pay cash for them. The more debt you have the less independent you are. Don’t keep up with the Joneses by borrowing. It is the road to prison. Pay off the credit card every month or use a debit card instead. Don’t spend money you don’t have. Live in a smaller house so you can more easily afford the mortgage payments. Gain some cash flow by investing in affordable rental houses in landlord friendly jurisdictions (not San Francisco!). You can buy these properties without ever visiting them and have the property manager and tenants in place as soon as you close on the property. They only sell to investors so you will not be competing with retail buyers. They will even help you sell the property if and when the time comes. I will give you two websites where this can easily be done: rpcinvest.com and noradarealestate.com. The more cash flow you have aside from your job income the more independent and less subject to tyranny you become. Grow your own food or buy from a local independent farmer to become less vulnerable in a food crisis. Keep a three month supply of non-perishable food on hand and some drinking water. Take action now before the next manufactured crisis arrives.

The choice is ours. Let’s choose freedom and be brave in the face of tyranny. As Thomas Paine said long ago:

” Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

Make College Affordable Again

I believe the continuing inflation we see in higher education is the direct result of the student loan program. The loans increase demand for the educational product and the increased demand drives up the cost. This spiral will continue until the government gets out of the student loan business. Why not government loans to buy cars or dishwashers or computers? Which part of article one section eight of the constitution authorizes the federal government to issue loans?

It is time for the education industry to be forced to produce a quality product at a competitive price just like the auto industry or the computer industry. We have all heard the stories of how our grandparents worked their way through college. This was possible when colleges had to compete and offer an affordable product. It is government student loans that have produced the high cost of higher education. It is no coincidence that it was about the same time the federal government started guaranteeing student loans that the cost of college began to accelerate.

Imagine for a moment no government student loans and the three following students going to a bank to apply for a student loan:

Student one had poor grades in school and did poorly on his college entrance exams. He says he wants to study psychology. His parents are willing to co-sign on the loan but have a poor credit score. The banker, not the taxpayer will take a loss if the student defaults. He politely says no. He doesn’t think the job market for psychology majors will be hot or that his chances of finishing the degree will be good. He realizes he won’t be doing this young man a favor by saddling him with debt he likely can’t repay.

Student two had better than average grades in high school and did slightly better than average on college entrance exams. She wants to get a degree in elementary education and be a teacher. Her parents have an average credit score and are willing to co-sign on the loan. The banker thinks she has a good chance of completing her degree and getting a job and that she and her parents are a good credit risk. He grants the loan.

Student three had better than average grades in most subjects, but was a whiz kid at math and took calculus in high school. In her college entrance exams she scored better than average overall and aced the mathematics part. She wants to be a mechanical engineer. Her parents are a better than average credit risk and are willing to co-sign. Upon further questioning, the banker learns that the young lady participated in several extra-curricular activities in high school and was student council president. She has already been waiting tables on Saturdays and making good tips. She plans to attend a college in her home town, live at home, and avoid paying for rent, utilities, travel and food. She plans to work during the summer months as a waitress and apply it to the loan. The banker thinks she has an excellent chance of finishing an engineering degree and paying back the loan. He gladly grants the loan.

In the meantime, the constant flow of cash to the colleges has evaporated. They stop building fancy new cafeterias, stop building new multi-million dollar exercise facilities which contribute nothing but cost to education and stop paying exorbitant salaries to middle management employees. As a matter of fact, many unnecessary administrative jobs have been eliminated. In addition, many of the “fluff” degree programs have been eliminated or greatly reduced. The colleges are having to compete on quality AND price. As a consequence an amazing thing happens: the cost of college starts to plummet rapidly.

It’s time to stop aiding the colleges to rip off students and taxpayers. It’s time to stop funding degrees with no market value. Let the wealthy fund their kids’ degree in art history or Latin American studies. Stop forcing taxpayers to do it. This will never happen unless you cut the funding. It’s time for congressmen and senators to stop posturing about the high cost of college and actually do something about it. Cut the funding and allow the free market and its incredible “invisible hand” to do its magic and make college affordable again.

Meet the New Boss

I was reading a meme on Facebook that was posted by a friend of mine. The meme falls under the general category of “If we would just elect the right leaders we could fix our problems.” He thinks Trump better than Biden. I agree that some politicians are better than others but I do not believe that politics is the solution. I believe the solutions lie outside of politics. As a matter of fact, I believe that politics is part of the problem. Why? Because a belief in politics implies a belief in government and government is not the solution; it is the problem. The following paragraphs are my thoughts in response to the post.

What we need is not new rulers but self-governance and I’m not talking about democracy. Democracy increases conflict by encouraging the 51% to impose its views on the other 49%. The conflict pits the masses against each other and empowers the ruling class. See the Hans-Hermann Hoppe book Democracy- The God that Failed for a thorough discussion. Don’t expect democracy to end your enslavement. Democracy merely gives us the illusion of control. How many times have we seen a politician say one thing on the campaign trail only to do the opposite after elected? In the 1932 presidential campaign FDR attacked Herbert Hoover for being a big spender, then enacted the New Deal after election, the biggest spending campaign in American history.

The answer is for everyone to stop believing in the need for rulers. Every government in human history has had and forever will have but one goal: to expropriate the populace. Statists give the robbery a fancy name: taxation. If 30 to 40 percent of your income goes to pay taxes you are a slave 30 to 40 per cent of the time. We are the slaves. The overseers working for the slave masters go by the name of president, congressman, senator, etc. The slave masters stay out of view but they pull the strings of the overseers by contributing large amounts to their election campaigns. The overseers are paid handsomely for creating laws that allow the extortion to continue. The professional extortioners go by the name of IRS agent or tax collector. For an excellent essay on the real reason governments exist see Murray Rothbard’s Anatomy of the State. You will never view the state with reverence again. You can find a free copy at Mises.org.

Why do we rarely see points of view such as mine in the newspaper or television? You won’t find this discussion on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News. Why? Because the news media are in bed with the slave masters. Today’s “news” is pure propaganda. The only reason to pay any attention to this propaganda is to gain insight into how the ruling class wants you to think. And have you noticed how much of the “news” centers around politics and government? That is not a coincidence. The ruling class wants you to think the solutions lie with them. It does not and never will. The Democrats and Republicans are just two sides of the same statist coin; they work for the same masters. The cruel trick of democracy is to make the slaves think they are the masters. It is a brilliant sleight of hand. For a detailed analysis of how we enslave ourselves by our own thoughts read The Most Dangerous Superstition by Larken Rose.

A brief survey of the twentieth century alone reveals the handiwork of governments. An estimated 40 million dead in World War I; an estimated 70-85 million dead in World War II . This does not include Vietnam, Korea, and the first Gulf War. Did the citizens of the combatant nations hate each other enough to individually travel to other countries and go on a killing spree? No, they were conscripted and made into soldiers. That’s “government speak” for they were enslaved by their own governments and forced to commit mass murder. And how about the dictators that sent an estimated 120 million or more of their own citizens to death in the twentieth century alone: Mao Tse-Tung, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot. These monsters were the results of our belief in authority yet that belief has been so firmly implanted into our minds we never question it.

So how would we survive without the mass murderers and extortioners “protecting” and “regulating” us? For a detailed discussion of how that could work, including the provision of education, policing, and national defense, see Market for Liberty by Linda and Morris Tannehill. There is nothing government does that cannot be done better and more efficiently by free markets. We all know that competition makes sports teams and businesses better, yet we have a government imposed monopoly in vital areas such as education, policing, and the courts. Why should a school continue to exist if it is not satisfactorily meeting the needs of its “customers?” If the police in Minneapolis during the summer of 2020 had been working for a private policing corporation that had been hired by the business owners in that city to protect their property would the looters have been allowed to destroy so many businesses? I doubt it. But the police weren’t working for the business owners; they were working for the city, and they were told to stand down by the politicians. The same thing happened in Portland; the thugs were allowed to take over multiple city blocks. The government courts have already ruled that the government police are under no obligation to protect you. You can’t sue them if they don’t protect you. If you contracted with a private policing agency to protect you and they failed to do so could you sue them? You betcha. Could you fire them after they failed to protect your business? Yes. Can you fire the city police? No. They are a government sanctioned monopoly and you can’t sue them for breach of contract or fire them. And if they beat you to a pulp for no good reason you have little recourse. Our government courts have created a special privilege called “qualified immunity” to protect cops. All they must do is utter the magic words “stop resisting arrest” (even if you are not resisting) just before they beat you. No such immunity would exist for police working for a private company. The bullies amongst then would soon be weeded out. They would be fired AND tried in court. And they would be tried in a free market arbitration court and the judge would not work for the policing agency. Are you beginning to see how this would work? We already have free market security companies and free market arbitration courts; we just need to move the criminal cases into these courts and out of the biased government courts.

Contrast that with our current government run system. In the highly unlikely event you were able to get a bully cop into court keep in mind that the judge, prosecutor, and cop all work for the same boss: government. That’s not a neutral court. Qualified immunity is a license to kill. The guilty verdict in the George Floyd death was a very rare exception (and Floyd did himself no favors by truly resisting arrest). I am not anti-cop. We need police but they should be working for us and not the state. We need free market policing.

Free markets are just people making voluntary exchanges with each other, without coercion. Voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. If I go to the Dollar Tree and buy a candy bar for $1 I value the candy bar more than the $1; the Dollar Tree values the $1 more than the candy bar. It’s a win-win exchange. The government prevents many win-win exchanges by the use of regulations. Regulations are not really there to protect the consumer. Regulations benefit special interest groups at the expense of everybody else. Regulations can either prevent a wanted exchange or force an unwanted exchange. For an example of an unwanted exchange ask yourself the following question: “Do I really want ethanol in my gasoline?” The ethanol requirement in gasoline is an extortion from your wallet into the the wallet of the special interest group agriculture. It is a win-lose exchange. The consumer loses by paying more for fuel. The winners include big agriculture and the politicians who receive large donations from big agriculture. The purpose of regulations is the same as the purpose of government in general- to enrich the few at the expense of the many. The rules that do make sense would be retained by the free market. Did you know that in some states you must be credentialed to braid hair or to create a flower arrangement? Whew! Sure glad they are “protecting” us. Think of the carnage inflicted by a bad flower arrangement!

But how would we keep pollution from the air and poison from our food without government? I will leave you with a little homework. Read the Tannehill book Market for Freedom and you will understand how the free market could solve this problem and every other problem government “solves”, and without the aid of coercion. Let’s end our enslavement. It is time to free our minds from “the most dangerous superstition,” the belief in government authority. Let’s look in the mirror and see the new boss.

A Libertarian Vision for Education

This discussion was triggered by an article I read on a conservative website which was dismayed that a national teachers union was funding legal services for teachers that teach critical race theory(despite newly created state laws against it).

What is critical race theory(CRT)? It teaches that caucasians are oppressors and racist, even if they are not aware of it. It teaches that minorities live in a country awash in systemic racism that is rigged against them. Caucasians are the beneficiaries of white privilege. Parents have begun pushing back against these ideas being taught in the public schools. Many white parents don’t wish their children to be told they are oppressors; many black parents don’t wish their children to be told the world is against them.

What is the libertarian position on this issue? It derives from the non-aggression principle: you can’t hit people and you can’t take their stuff. You can only agress against others when they threaten you; you can’t initiate aggression against any other person or their property.

How does this relate to public education? First, the money to fund the education is forcefully taken from people through taxation. We libertarians believe taxation is theft. If the mafia robbed you at gunpoint and sent the money to a school we would all view that as theft. If we gave this mafia the special name of “government” it would not change the fact that you have been robbed. Robbery violates the non-aggression principle cited above. We don’t make exceptions to the rule just because the thieves have given a special name to their robbery- taxation. And even if you think taxation is okay, why should Jones with no children have to pay for the education of Smith’s ten children? When parents bring children into the world they should be responsible for ALL the costs associated with them, not their neighbors.

In addition, who should get to decide what is taught to the children? We believe that should be the parents and the parents ONLY. The parents should decide what they are taught or even IF they are taught. Not a school board nor a state board of education nor a national education department nor a group of politicians.

We are all familiar with the concept of the separation of church and state and why it is important. Many of the American colonists fled religious persecution in England. Many European countries had an official state religion and wars were fought over what religion that would be. Why? Because the official state religion could use its power to suppress other religions or denominations and to gain special privileges for itself. The First Amendment wisely avoided these potential conflicts by saying “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

I believe we should separate education and state as well. When parents dislike what their kids are being taught they should not have to ask for the permission of a school board to change it. They should be able to vote with their feet and take their child and money with them.

Prior to the nineteenth century much education was privately funded and most people could read and write; people understood the value of education without coercion. Many of the people who pushed for mandatory public education had good intentions, but many of them who led the movement for mandatory public education wanted public education so they could indoctrinate the children(sound familiar?). They wanted to teach them to be obedient so they could work in a factory or serve in the military. They would not be taught entrepreneurship or independence or how to be an autodidact. What the designers wished to produce were obedient pawns, not independent thinkers.

Most of us believe, with good reason, that monopolies are bad. We learned that monopolies can charge high prices, give poor service, not react to customer feedback, and never have to worry about customers fleeing to a competitor despite a poor product or service. What is a public school but a government sanctioned monopoly? You are forced to fund them with taxes. You must send your kids there, unless you want to pay for the service twice by sending your kids to a private school or by taking on the unpaid job of homeschooling. If you don’t like the food at a local restaurant you can remove your money from that restaurant and give it to another. You’re not allowed to remove your money from the public school. You are forced to fund the service whether you like it or not.

There would be a number of benefits to moving schooling into the free market. But before I get into those benefits let me explain what I mean by a free market. It means no government interference in the schooling industry whatsoever. No minimum teacher to pupil ratios. No standardized curriculum. No teacher certification requirements. No mandatory school attendance. No tenure requirements. No hours attended requirements for graduation. No minimum or maximum number of students required.

Think of the variety of schools and innovation that would be created under this system. School A decides to focus on the three Rs: readin’, ‘ritin’, and ‘rithmetic. This school would focus on basic competence and would bring students up to speed in these subjects. Student Einstein would master the subjects in one year, pass the end of school competency exam, and be ready to move on. Student Average might take three years to master the subjects and pass the competency exam.

School B decides to be the advanced math and science shool. Its entrance exam will require students to have some basic competence in reading and math before attending. Einstein passes the entrance exam easily, decides to focus on computer science, and passes the computer science exit exam after two years. He’s only nine years old and is ready for college, but he wants to be a tech entrepreneur and his parents think he is too young to go off to college. So he attends a local school that specializes in teaching business skills three days a week, attends another school that teaches musicianship two days a week, and a martial arts school one day a week. He wants to be well rounded.

Meanwhile, another special young student Johnny entered the three Rs school but did not do well. Testing revealed that he was mentally challenged. Not to worry because school C is designed for just this type of student. The school uses entrance tests to ensure that Johnny doesn’t just have a single subject deficit such as dyslexia. The school is designed to prepare mentally challenged students for the work place. Because there are varied levels of the mentally challenged some of the students will be able to learn to do the three Rs but at a slower than normal pace; for others reading may be an unrealistic expectation. The ultimate goal of the school is to teach marketable work skills to the students. The administrators have networked with local businesses to ensure they are teaching useful skills.

School D decides to focus on vocational training. Because most of the vocations will require at least a minimum proficiency in reading, they require a completion certificate from the three Rs school before they can train in those vocations. A few of the vocations do not require reading and students entering those programs are not required to be literate. Many students who thought they could skip the reading school decide otherwise when they learn how few jobs they can do without it; they decide to attend the three Rs school after all. The vocational school has programs for mechanics, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, hair stylists, waitresses, and the like. Programs are added or subtracted according to market demand.

In addition to school vocational programs, the lifting of mandatory schooling has allowed many individuals to do on the job training. Many kids who were forced to attend school and hated every second of it have traded their frustration for productive work. The abolition of the minimum wage was an important adjunct to making this type of training possible. Youths who were once shut out of the work force can now get their foot in the door, enhance work skills, and earn a higher wage. The bottom rungs of the work ladder have been restored.

School E is designed on the traditional K-12 model so it also offers sports. Because it must compete with other schools it has become much more sensitive to parental wishes. For example, it offers optional Bible courses taught by local pastors. And the old home economics type courses have made a return; it turns out some parents like their daughters to have some baking and home accounting skills. As a matter of fact, all courses are optional and there are no grade levels. Taking a higher level course is not decided by age but by competence only. The school offers a general diploma that certifies competence in the traditional areas of learning. A bright student might achieve the diploma by age 12; a slower student may take until age 21. By the way, school E allows students from other schools in the area to participate in their sports programs; these programs ARE based on age. The school is a member of the voluntary High School Sports League. The league has competition categories based on team size and sets limits on when and how often teams can practice. Because the league is voluntary the member schools, with parental inut, have insisted that absolutely NO women that used to be men can play on the women’s teams.

Meanwhile, basketball coach Trey is out of a job. His old K-12 state supported school no longer exists and not all the new schools have sports teams. After conversing with several local school administrators he believes there will be ample interest in fielding a boys and girls basketball team, as well as wrestling and volleyball teams. Fortunately, he has a good reputation as a coach and decides to start a varsity basketball team. He forms a corporation. He recruits a group of his old players as investors as well as a ladies basketball coach, volleyball coach, and wrestling coach. He pays for some advertising to announce an upcoming meeting at the gym where he will lay out his plans for the sports teams. The attendance at the meeting exceeds his expectations. He asks for a show of hands at the meeting to see how many people might be interested in buying shares of the corporation. Many hands go up. He will be the initial CEO of the corporation and the largest investors as well as the other coaches will serve on the board of directors. They plan to hire an experienced CEO soon so that Trey can concentrate on coaching. They put together a business plan that will raise revenue from the following sources: sales of corporate shares, fees to players for joining the team, food and drink concessions during games, a wall with plaques honoring local business donors, fees for admission to games, and fees from renting the facility during the offseason for youth basketball, wrestling, and volleyball teams, concerts, speakers, etc. They secure a loan from a local bank, buy an old run down high school gymnasium on the cheap, perform some needed repairs, and get it in shape just in time for the upcoming basketball season. The board of directors decide to join the High School Sports League, a statewide organization, and abide by their rules for the teams. A local business makes a HUGE donation to the corporation in exchange for naming the facility after them: Tyson Gymnasium. Whew! Who knew starting a sports business would be so much work! Trey looks forward to next year when a new CEO can take some of the business load off his shoulders.

Remember earlier when I said that no certification would be required for teaching, just ability to teach? As it turns out, administrators of the new schools are more comfortable hiring certified teachers with teaching degrees and experience; they are in high demand. The new math and science oriented school is no exception and hire predominately teachers with a teaching degree. However, they decide to hire a couple of local computer whizzes to teach courses. One of them turns out to be a teaching “natural” and his students do well. Not so much with the second whiz. Although great at doing he is not so great at teaching and after a couple of years it is apparent that his computer prowess does not translate into teaching skills. He is so brilliant he just can’t understand why the students don’t “get it”. The school decides to let him go; they hire a traditional teacher to replace him.

School F makes a decision to go “woke”. Parents are not alerted to the decision. The junior high age students are taught ideas derived from Critical Race Theory. They will teach the white students they suffer from white privilege and are oppressors. Minority students are taught they are oppressed and are living in a white supremacist nation. The history classes trace the founding of the nation back to 1619 when the first black slaves were brought from Africa. All the Founding Fathers who were slave owners have blood on their hands, including the first President George Washington. An informant from within the school alerts parents to what is being taught. A furor abruptly ensues and angry parents descend on the school administrators. The administrators refuse to yield. They will continue to teach the kids what they should know with or without parental consent. The administration is about to learn a valuable lesson about free markets economics. Their funding is no longer controlled by state boards of education or a national education department or by politicians. The school is 100% funded by the parents. The parental dilemma is quickly resolved. Fifty percent of the parents remove their kids from the school and the parents hire a lawyer to the sue the school for breach of contract. A court rules in favor of the parents and orders the school to refund fees to the parents. After repaying the fees the school cannot meet payroll and is forced to file for bankruptcy. It is a casualty in the new free market in education. In a free market businesses that spit on their customers soon perish.

School G opts for an online model of teaching. It provides computers with an internet connection so that parents can choose from a wide variety of online courses and curricula. For example, the Ron Paul Homeschool curriculum has become quite popular. It teaches kids independent thinking skills, how to become self-taught, and how to start a business. The on-site workers at the school serve to keep the students on task, to proctor tests, and to answer questions the students have about the subjects they are studying. The on-site teachers are well rounded so they can answer questions about a variety of subjects. They can also act as personal tutors for students who may be struggling. The school provides an exercise area and physical education teacher as well. The students can run laps, do push-ups or sit-ups, or use a variety of exercise machines. The PE teacher ensures they are being done safely. An OK letter from a physician is required before students can participate in PE activities. All teachers at the school are required to be certified in CPR. Because the school can be used to access a wide variety of curricula the student level ranges from first grade through graduate school. The school is open from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. and students can check in or check out at any time. Parents enjoy the option of taking their kids to lunch whenever they please. There are no standard school hours. Martha attends from 8-2 Monday through Friday. Sam only attends online school on Tuesday and Thursday. He attends another school on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Student fees are assessed according to the number of hours spent at the school. This “pay for what you use” model has been adopted by most schools, allowing parents maximum flexibiity and affordability for their children’s education. Younger non-driving students can only leave with adults specifically designated by their parents. Driving students must come and go according to a schedule dictated by their parents. The school keeps attendance records for billing purposes and parental reference only; mandatory attendance laws have been abolished.

A major benefit of the new free market education system has been cost containment and quality enhancement. The factors making this possible include: competition for students among schools, no compulsion to complete high school, less cost from kids who didn’t wish to be there, no rules for starting a school that drives up costs, no accreditation process, no tenure laws, no mandatory standardized tests, no state funding. It turns out that when schools don’t get an automatic check from the state the cost goes down and the quality goes up. Imagine that!

There is no such thing as a perfect educational system and the new free market system with no mandates is no exception. Although most parents realize the value of education and choose to send their kids to school or homeschool, a few do not. The numbers are extremely low but some reach the age of 18 without any formal education. Fortunately, a coalition of charitable organizations including the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and many others have foreseen this and similar eventualities. They will provide grants for any students who cannot afford to attend school, including individuals who are no longer minors. The coalition has made the commitment to support all levels of schooling including graduate school. They support school based and on the job vocational training as well. Their motto is “no mind left behind.”

One objection to this type of model is that education is too important to leave to the free market and must be provided by government. Really? Is education more important than food? Without food and you won’t need an education; you’ll be dead. The free market provides a wide variety of choices for food. You can have expensive steak and lobster or you can have a peanut butter sandwich dirt cheap. There is nothing provided by government that can’t be provided better and cheaper by the market. Nothing, including education.

Another objection to a free market in education is that it will be unaffordable for poor families. In other words, no businesses will cater to the poor. Experience refutes that argument. How many of those poor families have smart phones? Heating and air conditioning? High definition color television sets? Automobiles? Stoves? Refrigerators? Two or more bedrooms? One or more bathrooms? Dishwashers? Washers and dryers? And what if our poor family wants to splurge and eat out? Have you heard of McDonald’s? Taco Bell? Captain D’s? Domino’s? And how will our poor family get to the restaurant? Have you heard of the Toyota Corolla? The Honda Civic? The Nissan Versa? The Ford Fiesta? Most of them come standard with anti-lock brakes, air bags, air conditioning, radios, power brakes, power door locks, and power windows. But somehow education will be different and the free market won’t provide options for the poor. How can people make this argument with a straight face?

Let’s say for the sake of argument the naysayers are correct and notwithstanding all the evidence to the contrary, the free market does not provide a product for the poor. That’s where private charities can fill the void. And what if private charities along with the uber wealthy such as Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos and the Waltons turn a blind eye to the problem? Then we might be tempted to have government step in at that point and provide funding. But we would be returning to the original problem with top-down control rather than parental control. In addition, government funding would start to raise the costs again. Schools, knowing that government will make up the difference, would begin to raise fees again. This is exactly what has happened at the universities. The injection of government cash via student loans and grants has allowed the universities to raise fees above market price. The result is that college is unaffordable without loans or scholarships. Universities don’t care if their students fail; 40% of entering freshmen will not graduate but those 40% do serve to drive up costs by increasing demand. This outrageous state of affairs could not exist without government intervention preventing true free market competition. So we must draw a hard line in the sand and say no state intervention. Once the camel’s nose gets under the tent, soon he’ll be eating your dinner.

There will also be objections from the usual suspects that loathe parental control of education: teachers unions, education bureacrats, politicians, race-hustlers. In other words, resistance will be heaviest from those who benefit the most from the status quo.

It’s time we rethink education. It’s time we end the public education monopoly. It’s time we separate education and state. It’s time we put parents back in control of their children’s education. As the folks at Apple Computer might say, it’s time to think different.

Wealth Inequality’s Real Culprits

A recent MarketWatch article featured quotes from JP Morgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon. He is one of the oligarchs and puppet masters who pull the strings of the politicians to get the economy rigged for themselves at the expense of the masses. In part of his comments he laments wealth inequality to virtue signal his concerns about the issue. His comments are taken from his annual letter to shareholders. I will share some of his quotes below and comment on them.

Jamie Dimon: “Our nation is clearly under a lot of stress and strain from various events: the COVID-19 pandemic, of course, which has taken more American lives than the total lost in World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War combined, resulting in acute economic distress for millions more…”

Comment: It is not the pandemic itself but the government reaction to the pandemic(lockdowns) that has wrecked the economy. The government then passed the CARES act and subsequent “stimulus” bills which sent much more money to corporations such as the airlines than it did to individuals.

Jamie Dimon: “…the brutal murder of George Floyd and the racial unrest that followed; the divisive 2020 presidential election, culminating in the storming of the Capitol and the attempt to disrupt our democracy; and the seemingly inevitable, but nonetheless alarming and unnerving, rise of China, threatening America’s global preeminence…”

Comment: The trial of police officer charged in the case of George Floyd is ongoing as he wrote this. Opportunists like Dimon would have him executed without a trial. The BLM narrative that the Floyd death was racially motivated has no basis in fact, yet it is assumed that the death of ANY minority at the hands of ANY white police officer is racist.

The disruption to democracy that he refers to occured during the 2020 election when boat loads of mail-in ballots all of a sudden appeared deep in the night and Joe Biden, who could not get more than a dozen people to attend one of his campaign rallies, was declared President. Afterward, tens of thousands of Americans who felt disenfranchised showed up at the Capitol on January sixth to protest. A few of them entered the building without violence and the episode was termed an insurrection by the Democrats and their presstitutes. No dummies. An insurrection involves lots of guns and bloodshed and destruction. There was an unarmed white ex-military female protester that was murdered by a black Capitol police officer during the event. No charges were filed and no tears were shed by the presstitutes or people like Jamie Dimon. We can imagine the reaction if the protesters had been Democrats, the officer white and the dead woman black.

Dimon then speaks of the unnerving rise of China. The crony capitalists in the defense industry need an enemy to justify U.S. military spending. Of the top eleven nations vis-a-vis military spending the U.S. is number one and spends more then the next ten combined including Russia and China. That is why China must be an enemy. It is why the establishment hacks in D.C. accused Trump of being a Russian agent. He could not be allowed to normalize relations with Russia. Continuing to treat China and Russia as enemies does NOT make American safer but does the opposite. Creating and extending tensions with nuclear armed countries is hubristic, careless, and dangerous. But it is worth the risk if you sell arms.

In the above quote Dimon also worries that America is losing its global preeminence to China. It is interesting to note that in recent decades China has abondoned pure communism in the economic sphere and allowed capitalism to take root. Could it be that China’s rising economic fortunes can largely be attributed to the rise of capitalism in that country? Meanwhile, western nations such as the U.S. have lurched in the socialist direction. The rise of socialistic impulses seen with the New Deal and the Great Society are now firmly entrenched with programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, and low-income housing. The D.C. political class no longer believes in laissez-faire capitalism. It no longer has faith in private charity. It has embraced crony-capitalism, a.k.a. corporatism or economic fascism. Corporatism is in the process of eviscerating the middle class; the remaining structure will be one of either rich or poor. The resulting wealth inequality is real but is not being created, as the political class and media would have us believe, by systemic racism but rather by the D.C. crowd, who have rejected free market capitalism and the wealth it produces for EVERYBODY. One example of rejection of the free market comes in the form of the minimum wage. The economic and historic illiterates that champion the concept don’t realize that the minimum wage was originally conceived in the 1930s in order to prevent blacks from competing with whites for blue collar jobs; this according to black economist Walter Williams(R.I.P. Walter). The minimum wage hurts most those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder by denying them work opportunities. If the minimum wage is $15/hr and your labor is only worth $10/hr you are unemployed. And it will cause many minimum wage jobs to be replaced by machines. Have you noticed the order taking kiosks at McDonalds or the self checkout counters at Walmart? In addition, it causes price inflation that disproportionately hurts the poor. In short, economic destruction comes primarily not from the enemy without such as China but the enemy within such as Jamie Dimon and his buddies in D.C.

Funny aside: Dr. Walter Williams taught economics at George Mason University for many years. He once told a class of students that he was not in favor of anti-discrimination laws because he felt them no longer necessary because businesses are in the business of making money and that discriminating against a group would be bad for business. This applies not just to customers but to hires as well. Businesses will naturally hire the most qualified for a job regardless of race or gender in an attempt to gain a market advantage. Anti-discrimination laws are also an attack on private property- if you own the business only you should be allowed to determine its policies. Can you imagine the bad press if a company said “no blacks allowed?” Williams then goes on to tell the class how he discriminated against white girls and fat girls when searching for a wife. And when he finally chose a wife he discriminated against all the other women on earth.

Jamie Dimon: America has “faced tough times before,” he said, adding that the cited problems are fixable. But first the institutions that have lost the trust of the people — government, schools, media and businesses — must regain that trust and understand that the underlying problem is inequality. “The enormous wealth of our country is accruing to the very few,” he said.

Comment: No kidding Jamie. And you are one of enormously wealthy few. I have no problem with people acquiring wealth honestly through the free market. But the quickest way to wealth is to bribe government to give your company or industry special favors. Jamie Dimon and his JP Morgan company made some risky bets on financial derivatives prior to the 2008 financial meltdown. Then the bets turned sour. Rather than have to face the economic consequences of his own bad decisions he ran to government for help; his company and others like his received hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts from you and I Joe and Jill Taxpayer. Wealth inequality anyone? The hypocrisy is so thick you would need a steak knife to cut through it. Nay, you would need a chainsaw. Social scientist and economic historian Franz Oppenheimer said in his marvelous book The State that wealth can be acquired in two ways. He referred to the acquisition of wealth through the free market and honest work as the economic means. The acquisition of wealth by using the coercive power of the state he termed the political means. As I have stated before, the quickest way to eliminate the political means of wealth acquisition is strip the state of its ability to “regulate commerce.” We need separation of commerce and state. And because of the socialist indoctrination factories known as the public schools and universities, we need separation of education and state as well. The state and its regulatory apparatus is the enemy, not China or Russia or Iran. The real source of wealth inequality? The state and its crony allies such as Jamie Dimon.

Who is Shaking the Jar?

I saw this interesting quote today:

“If you catch 100 red fire ants as well as 100 large black ants, and put them in a jar, at first, nothing will happen. However, if you violently shake the jar and dump them back on the ground the ants will fight until they eventually kill each other. The thing is, the red ants think the black ants are the enemy and vice versa, when in reality, the real enemy is the person who shook the jar. This is exactly what’s happening in society today. Liberal vs. Conservative. Black vs. White. Pro Mask vs. Anti-Mask. Vax vs. Anti-vax. Rich vs. poor. Man vs. woman. Cop vs. citizen. The real question we need to be asking ourselves is who’s shaking the jar… and why?” – Shera Starr

Note: I often use the terms government and state interchangeably.

So who is shaking the jar and why? The answer to the first part of the question is the D.C. swamp creatures and their corporate overlords. The overlords are the oligarchs and corporations that benefit from government largesse such as George Soros, Bill Gates, Boeing, Verizon, Amazon. They fund the deception. The swamp creatures are those that spend their careers in or connected to D.C.: politicians, think tank inhabitants, lobbyists, workers at the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Energy Department, CDC, NIH, Department of Education, CIA, DEA, I could go on for days. Their careers and 401ks depend on maintaining and better yet extending the largesse.

I cannot overemphasize the role the mainstream media plays in this legerdemain. We see one fake news story after another day after day, month after month, year after year. The media sends out whatever rubbish D.C. feeds them. They are in bed with the swamp creatures. The media whores at CNN parrot the democratic version; the media whores at Fox parrot the republican version. Conflict sells. If it bleeds it leads. Keep the populace entertained and fed(bread and circuses) and they won’t notice. Shaking the jar keeps our attention diverted from what they don’t want us to see.

Why are they shaking the jar? Why do the oligarchs fund the likes of BLM and antifa to sow disharmony and conflict? It’s the old divide and conquer strategy. If we spend our time fighting with each other we won’t notice THEY ARE STEALING US BLIND. They even invented a clever euphemism for the theft to make it seem dignified- taxation. The theft of your wages before you even get paid are called payroll taxes. The theft whenever you buy products essential to live are called sales taxes. The theft of your home even after you have paid off the mortgage is called a property tax. The theft imposed when you open a business is called a business license, when you fish a fishing license, when you hunt a hunting license, when you drive a driver’s license. When you are young and have to pay for the pensions of the old because they were robbed when they were young it’s called the social security tax.

The theft can come in clever forms such as the so-called Federal Reserve System. This system is essentially a government-sanctioned cartel of bankers that creates money that is first handed to its well connected friends. These cronies can use the money before the inflationary effects of the money printing begin. By the time we cattle get any of the money it is worth less than it was when the cronies got it. Another example of the subtle theft can be seen by asking this question: How many bombs has the U.S. military dropped around the world the past ten years? You know the number is really large. How much did those bombs cost? You know the number is really larger. Who made money on the bombs? Not you citizen. Who paid for the bombs? You citizen. The subtle theft here goes from the pockets of us taxpayers to the pockets of the bomb makers. And don’t expect your media faves at Fox News to complain about the warfare state. Fox News likes big government too; they pretend they don’t. It’s all part of the deception.

We are told the taxation theft is not really theft because we agreed to it. I didn’t agree to it, did you? We are told the theft is necessary because it covers services that could not be provided by the private sector such as education and road building. But the literacy rate was high BEFORE public education started to be implemented in the 19th century and the first roads in America were built with private funding. We are told the state must provide the judicial system but we already have a functioning private court system; it is called arbitration. The truth is there is nothing the state provides, including national defense, that could not be provided by the private sector much more efficiently. To see how defense might be provided by the private sector see “Chaos Theory: Two Essays on Market Anarchy” by economist Robert Murphy.

We can begin to stop the theft by first educating ourselves about the true nature of the state. I recommend the short book “Anatomy of the State” by Murray Rothbard or for a longer version read “The State” by sociologist Franz Oppenheimer. You won’t see these texts recommended by your local government monopoly school system. Take the “blue pill” and extricate yourself from the matrix created by the state and its media harlots.

Liberty Watch Episode 21: The Declaration of Independence

The following is the outline text version of my YouTube video which can be viewed by clicking here:  https://youtu.be/jaOQYfJCw5k

You can subscribe to my YouTube channel by clicking here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIb4k41f3A1lftMXivcvj5g.

You can make a donation at patreon.com/libertymanvan

I.                    Synopsis

A.                 Context- already at war with Britain

B.                 The colonies would now consider themselves thirteen free and independent states no longer under British rule

C.                 The Declaration of Independence was drafted by the committee of five during the Second Continental Congress

D.                The principle author was Thomas Jefferson

E.                 Sections

1.                 Introduction

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

2.                 Preamble

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,…

3.                 Indictment

Lists all the grievances against King George III.

4.                 Denunciation

5.                 Conclusion

 

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States;…

…And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

6.                 Signatures- 56 total

a)                 John Hancock most famous?

II.                 Context of the Declaration of Independence

The United States Declaration of Independence is the statement adopted by the Second Continental Congress meeting at the Pennsylvania State House (now known as Independence Hall) in Philadelphia on July 4, 1776. The Declaration announced that the thirteen American colonies then at war with the Kingdom of Great Britain would regard themselves as thirteen independent sovereign states no longer under British rule. With the Declaration, these new states took a collective first step toward forming the United States of America. The declaration was signed by representatives from New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.  The Declaration was passed on July 2nd with no opposing votes.

III.               Drafting Committee

The Committee of Five:  This Declaration committee operated from June 11, 1776, until July 5, 1776, the day on which the Declaration was published.  The members were Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson.  The original draft was written by Thomas Jefferson and was then edited by the other members before it was presented to the full Congress.

IV.               Source Documents

Jefferson’s most immediate sources were two documents written in June 1776: his own draft of the preamble of the Constitution of Virginia, and George Mason’s draft of the Virginia Declaration of Rights. Ideas and phrases from both of these documents appear in the Declaration of Independence.[83] They were, in turn, directly influenced by the 1689 English Declaration of Rights, which formally ended the reign of King James II.

A.                 Virginia Declaration of Rights

Section 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

Section 5. That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinct from the judiciary;

Section 8. That in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man has a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of twelve men of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he cannot be found guilty; nor can he be compelled to give evidence against himself; that no man be deprived of his liberty except by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.

Section 9. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Section 10. That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.

Section 11. That in controversies respecting property, and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred.

Section 12. That the freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.

Section 13. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

Section 16. That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion.

B.                 1689 English Bill of Rights

The Act asserted “certain ancient rights and liberties” by declaring that:

the pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;

levying taxes without grant of Parliament is illegal;

it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;

keeping a standing army in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;

the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;

excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;

V.                 John Locke 1632-1704 English Political Philosopher

A.                 Second Treatise of Government

Of the State of Nature.  “TO understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man.

THE natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.

The great and chief end, therefore, of men’s uniting into common-wealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property.

VI.               Text of the Declaration of Independence

In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

Introduction:  The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

Preamble:  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Indictment:  “Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

“He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness of his invasions on the rights of the people.

“He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

“He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

“He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

“For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

“For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

“For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

“For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

“For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

“For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

“For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

“He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

 

Conclusion:  “We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States;…

…And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

VII.            Inspired Martin Luther King

Used the Declaration to highlight how we failed to live up to our creed

Video from the “I have a dream” speech.

Liberty Watch Episode 20: Liberal Media Bias on Display

The following is the outline text version of my YouTube video which can be viewed by clicking here:  https://youtu.be/8k0JGczKoxk

You can subscribe to my YouTube channel by clicking here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIb4k41f3A1lftMXivcvj5g.

You can make a donation at patreon.com/libertymanvan

Liberal Media Bias- Again

Samantha Bee flies but Roseanne dies

Shows media and corporate double standard

Rosanne Barr

Makes racist remark on twitter
Described former obama adviser valerie jarrett as the product of what would happen if  “the muslim brotherhood and the planet of the apes had a baby.”
Quickly apologizes

“I apologize to Valerie Jarrett and to all Americans. I am truly sorry for making a bad joke about her politics and her looks. I should have known better. Forgive me-my joke was in bad taste.”

gets fired anyway

Samantha Bee

Makes vile remark about Ivanka Trump
Uses the “c” word
makes a fake apology

“I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and to my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night,” Bee wrote. “It was inappropriate and inexcusable. I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it.”

Bees remark came one day after Roseanne Barr was fired for her offensive tweet.

backtracks on apology during tv academy awards broadcast

“Our piece attracted controversy of the worst kind,” Bee said of the segment about the Trump administration’s immigration and border policies that ended with her calling Ivanka Trump a “feckless cunt” who needed to “do something about [her] dad’s immigration practices.”

 

“We spent the day wrestling with the repercussions of one bad word, when we all should have spent the day incensed that as a nation we are wrenching children from their parents and treating people legally seeking asylum as criminals,” Bee added. “If we are OK with that then really, who are we?”

former comedy central host jon stewart comes to her defense

“I’m going to tell you something about Sam Bee, because I’ve known her for a very long time. You could not find a kinder, smarter, more lovely individual than Samantha Bee. Trust me, if she called someone a cunt…” Steward said, according to the Daily Beast, with a silence allowing the audience to finish his thought.

actress Minnie Driver

Academy Award-nominated actress Minnie Driver said Thursday that Ivanka Trump does not possess the intelligence or personality to be described as a “c*nt,” the profane term used by comedian Samantha Bee.

“That was the wrong word for Samantha Bee to have used,” Driver wrote on Twitter. “But mostly because ( to paraphrase the French ) Ivanka has neither the warmth nor the depth.”

keeps her job

Libertarian perspective

ABC should be able to fire Roseanne Barr

TBS should be able to retain Samantha Bee

If you are offended they did nothing, stop watching the show
Consumers can vote with their feet

Teachers Strike

Several states from West Virginia to Arizona

Asking for more pay and school funding

LMV Perspective

Education should be privately funded

Public schools are a monopoly

Home schooling or private school parents have to pay twice

“Too important to leave to the market”

Food more essential than education
tremendous variety provided by the market

No competition decreases quality

How much to pay teachers?

An example of the mises’ calculation problem
Problem solved by a free market

Teachers compensation underestimated by media

From the fee.org article entitled “How Media Outlets Misinform the Public about Teacher Pay.”

…During recent teacher walkouts in Oklahoma that captured national attention, many major media outlets reported misleadingly small figures for teacher pay. By failing to reveal all aspects of teacher compensation, these outlets hid the true costs to taxpayers—which now amount to an annualized average of about $120,000 for every public school teacher in the United States.

…CNN, for example, published an article by Bill Weir claiming that in “most districts” of Oklahoma, “a teacher with a doctorate degree and 30 years’ experience will never make more than $50,000 a year.” That claim, which CNN neglected to document, is at odds with comprehensive data from the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Labor. This information for Oklahoma and the entire nation follows.

 

…For the 2016–17 school year, the Department of Education reports that the average salary of full-time public school teachers was $58,950 in the U.S. and $45,245 in Oklahoma. Those figures generally exclude benefits, such as health insurance, paid leave, and pensions.

…According to the Department of Labor, benefits comprise an average of 33 percent of compensation for public school teachers. Including benefits, teachers’ average annual compensation jumps to $87,854 in the U.S. and about $67,429 in Oklahoma. This excludes unfunded pension liabilities and certain post-employment benefits like health insurance.

…That, however, still doesn’t tell the complete story because full-time private industry employees work an average of 37 percent more hours per year than full-time public school teachers. This includes the time that teachers spend for lesson preparation, test construction and grading, providing extra help to students, coaching, and other activities.

…Accounting for the disparity between the annual work hours of full-time public school teachers and full-time private industry workers, the average annualized cost of employing teachers in the 2016–17 school year was $120,578 per teacher in the U.S. and about $92,545 in Oklahoma.

…There is yet more to this picture because the costs of living vary between states. Adjusted for this, the average annualized immediate compensation of Oklahoma teachers in 2016–17 was about $102,943, or roughly twice what CNN says “a teacher with a doctorate degree and 30 years’ experience will never make” in “most districts” of Oklahoma.

Partial end to Federal marijuana ban?

Trump said probably would support Sen. Cory Gardner(R-CO) bill

Would end Federal prohibition in states that have passed laws already

Gardner had earlier threatened to hold up Trump’s DOJ appointments

Trump quote

“I support Sen. Gardner,” the president said before departing for the G-7 summit in Canada, as quoted by the Los Angeles Times. “I know exactly what he’s doing. We’re looking at it. But I probably will end up supporting that, yes.”

LMV opposition to Federal ban

Violates personal sovereignty

Smoking weed does not violate the non-aggression principle

Not a power delegated to Congress under article one section eight of the U.S. Constitution

Violates states’ rights

States can have a ban provided it does not violate their state constitution

GOP not a small government party

From the reason.com article entitled “Stop Calling the GOP the Party of Small Government.”

There was a time when GOP lawmakers called for the elimination of entire federal agencies. Today, milquetoast promises to pursue smaller government are followed by votes for ever bigger government.

As Milton Friedman noted, the true size of the state is measured by how much money it spends. Budget data show that all modern presidents, regardless of party affiliation, have increased the federal fiscal footprint—but Republican administrations have generally increased the amount spent at a faster rate than Democratic ones.

Under George W. Bush, who was elected on a platform of fiscal restraint, total federal spending increased in real terms by 53 percent. Enabled and encouraged by a Republican-led Congress, his administration adopted the politically self-serving notion that “deficits don’t matter.” No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, and bank bailouts serve as a vivid reminder that shrinking the state doesn’t stand a chance.

The only way to decrease the spending?

Cut the purse strings

End coercive taxation

LMV solution:  Constitutional amendment to make all taxation voluntary

Liberty Watch Episode 19: Sports Gambling Legalized

The following is the outline text version of my YouTube video which can be viewed by clicking here:  https://youtu.be/UubIS1N8Xl8

You can subscribe to my YouTube channel by clicking here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIb4k41f3A1lftMXivcvj5g.

You can make a donation at patreon.com/libertymanvan

Sports Gambling Legalized?

The libertarian perspective on issue

Does not violate the non-aggression principle

No one takes your stuff without your consent

No one beats you up

Who gets to choose if you gamble on sports?

You

Someone else

The supreme court’s view

Justice Alito writes majority 6-3 opinion

PASPA ruled unconstitutional for wrong reason

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act

 

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) makes it

unlawful for a State or its subdivisions “to sponsor, operate, advertise,

promote, license, or authorize by law or compact . . . a lottery,

sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme based

. . . on” competitive sporting events, 28 U. S. C. §3702(1), and for “a

person to sponsor, operate, advertise, or promote” those same gambling

schemes if done “pursuant to the law or compact of a governmental

entity,”

 

And the Constitution indirectly restricts the

States by granting certain legislative powers to Congress,

see Art. I, §8, while providing in the

 

Supremacy Clause

that federal law is the “supreme Law of the Land . . . any

Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the

Contrary notwithstanding,” Art. VI, cl. 2. This means that

when federal and state law conflict, federal law prevails

and state law is preempted.

[Actual text of the article VI clause 2 supremacy clause:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.]

[Laws passed that are unconstitutional are not the “supreme law of the land.”  Reductio ad absurdum.  Congress passes law that says you must kill your firstborn child.]

 

The legislative powers granted to Congress are sizable[see Madison contradicting statement],

but they are not unlimited. The Constitution confers[should be delegates] on

Congress not plenary legislative power but only certain

enumerated powers. Therefore, all other legislative power is reserved for the States, as the Tenth Amendment confirms.  And conspicuously absent from the list of powers given to Congress is the power to issue direct orders to the governments of the States.[How about the power to prohibit gambling not in article 1 section 8?]

 

…The PASPA provision at issue here—prohibiting state

authorization of sports gambling—violates the anticommandeering

rule.

…It is as if federal officers were installed in state legislative

chambers and were armed with the authority to stop

legislators from voting on any offending proposals. A more

direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine.

…Congress can regulate sports gambling directly but if it elects not to do so each state is free to act on its own.[Again, no authority in article 1 section 8 to regulate sports gambling]

Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution

Does not authorize much of what Congress has done

Social security

Providing health insurance

Involvement in education

Prohibition of alcohol and drugs

18th amendment established alcohol prohibition
21st amendment repealed the eighteenth amendment

Prohibition of gambling

The text

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

 

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

 

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

 

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

 

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

 

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

 

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

 

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

 

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

 

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

 

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

 

To provide and maintain a Navy;

 

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

 

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

 

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Comments by the Founding Fathers

Federalist 45- James Madison

“The powers delegated by the proposed constitution to the federal government are few and defined,” not “sizable” as Justice Alito writes in this opinion.

Federalist 39- James Madison

“The local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of supremacy, no more subject in their respective spheres to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them within their own sphere.  In this relation then the proposed government cannot be deemed a national one because its jurisdiction pertains to enumerated objects only and leaves to the states a residuary and inviolable sovereignty over all other objects.”

Federalist 83- Alexander Hamilton

“An affirmative grant of special powers would be absurd as well as useless if a general authority was intended.”

Madison in 1792 on the House floor regarding the Constitution’s commerce clause

“I venture to declare it as my opinion, that, were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America.”

 

… “If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare and are the sole and supreme judges  of the general welfare they may take care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every state, county and parish; they may pay them out of the public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume provision for the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post roads.  In short, everything from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police would be thrown under the power of Congress, for every object I have mentioned would admit the obvious application of money that might be called provisions for the general welfare.”

 

LMV:  In other words, the general welfare, necessary and proper, and commerce clauses were not powers of their own but descriptions of the purposes of those limited and enumerated powers already mentioned in the Constitution.

Libertarian Humor

This graphic shows some people crawling under a barbed wire fence.  The caption reads “Look at me crawling under barbed wire to escape free market capitalism.  Said no one ever.”

Reminiscent of the wall separating East Berlin from West Berlin

Reagan “tear down this wall” clip

LMV:  That’s the show.  See you next time.

Liberty Watch Episode 18: Guaranteed Jobs for All

The following is the outline text version of my YouTube video which can be viewed by clicking here:  https://youtu.be/UlTXqUEmEuU

You can subscribe to my YouTube channel by clicking here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIb4k41f3A1lftMXivcvj5g.

You can make a donation at patreon.com/libertymanvan

Guaranteed Jobs for All

Outline of proposal thin on details

Provide a $15/hr job AND health benefits or training “for all who want or need one.”

What happens to those making $10/hr at current job?

What happens to employees only worth $8/hr?

Effect on small businesses who can only pay $10/hr?

Will have to be funded by taxpayers

1.              Borrow the money- tax on future generations

2.              Increase taxes today

3.              Force costs on business- individuals will pay through price inflation

Businesses will either

Get a taxpayer funded subsidy

Lose employees

Pay the $15/hr plus health insurance

Layoff employees to meet payroll

Go out of business- will favor big business

II.            Dark Chocolate Please

A new study at Loma Linda University in California show dark chocolate good for health:  The darker the chocolate, the better it is for your health: Bars with more than 70% cacao do wonders for your mind, heart and immune system – and the benefits increase the higher you go

A new study by Loma Linda University is the first to assess specific benefits of cacao levels in something as small as a chocolate bar

They found anything over 70% cacao was much more beneficial than any less

The higher the concentration of cacao, the more beneficial the chocolate was.

Cacao is rich in flavanols – antioxidants found in fruit and vegetables that dampen inflammation.

People who ate chocolate every day were found to have better attention spans, working memory, ability to process speed and verbal fluency.

Experiments showed a daily hit of chocolate for elderly people improved their brain function.

The benefits were most pronounced in those people who had already started to show signs of memory decline or mild cognitive impairment that can lead to Alzheimer’s.

III.          Virgin Ban

 

From a fox news article entitled “Couple caught having sex on transatlantic flight, woman banned from airline.”

A transatlantic restroom dalliance aboard a Virgin Atlantic flight ended with the woman involved banned from ever again flying on the airline.

According to reports, the cabin crew aboard a March 13 flight that departed from Gatwick Airport in London en route to Cancún, Mexico were furious to find a man and woman – both in their late twenties – having sex in the economy cabin bathroom.

Minutes later, the rowdy woman got into a spat with her female traveling companion and reportedly threw drinks around the cabin.

A Virgin Atlantic spokesman confirmed to Fox News that the woman was not banned “as a result of one incident,” but for “repeatedly refusing to comply with crew requests, and for disruptive behavior throughout the flight.”

 Government Sins

A.             Gas Tax Raiders

From an article in Forbes Magazine entitled “The Gas Tax Doesn’t Work Because Politicians Broke It.”

…the gas tax’s problems started when Congress raided the trust fund to keep the government solvent. In 1990 Congress approved an increase in the gas tax but allotted only half of the new revenue to building projects. The other half was dedicated to deficit reduction – which then, as now, was all the rage. In 1993 Congress approved another gas tax hike and again devoted some of the revenue to deficit reduction.

B.             Government Recycling Programs Wasteful

From the mises.org article “Government Recycling Programs Waste Valuable Resources.”

… The government tells us we must recycle all kinds of stuff: bottles, cans, paper, plastics etc. They say that recycling reduces the number of products made from natural resources, which means more resources are conserved and our energy costs are lower.

… Our objective is to minimize the use of resources (including energy) in the manufacturing process for all products. In order to achieve our objective, we must be guided by market prices, without exception. As long as prices are allowed to freely adjust to changes in supply and demand, resources will be allocated to their most highly valued uses, and resource conservation will be maximized. The capitalistic process of profits and losses ensures these outcomes.

Economics of Recycling

In an unhampered market, if it is profitable to manufacture products by recycling plastics, bottles, paper etc., then it will be done, and firms might even pay us to take away our empty containers. However, if such a business is not profitable, then these items would simply be included in our regular household garbage. And by the way, we are NOT running out of landfill space.

… To determine the viability of a recycling enterprise, a free market firm must balance the cost of committing resources (labour, trucks, machines, recycling plants) to the task of recycling against the revenue it receives for its recycled products.

… if the firm does not believe the enterprise would be profitable, it will not proceed with recycling… This is the point constantly overlooked by the public when governments involve themselves in recycling. In our rush to conserve resources, we forget that resources are required for the task of recycling, and we just assume the government is doing the right thing.

… the price for recycling often tends to soar far higher than the combined cost of manufacturing from raw materials and virgin sources and dumping rubbish into landfills. To recycle waste is to use twice the energy and create twice the pollution from factories, trucks, and by-products.

… This is typical of most regulations at every level of government: (1) use propaganda to convince people of the need for a particular program in order to attract votes, then (2) use whatever resources are required to implement and maintain the program, regardless the waste.

 

C.             Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

From “Twenty years ago today, America apologized for Tuskegee syphilis experiment.” Article dated May 16, 2017.

… In the fall of 1932, the flyers began appearing around Macon County, Ala., promising colored people special treatment for “bad blood.” “Free Blood Test; Free Treatment, By County Health Department and Government Doctors,” the black and white signs said. “YOU MAY FEEL WELL AND STILL HAVE BAD BLOOD. COME AND BRING ALL YOUR FAMILY.”

… Hundreds of men-all black and many of them poor – signed up. Some of the men thought they were being treated for rheumatism or bad stomachs. They were promised free meals, free physicals and free burial insurance. What the signs never told them was they would become part of the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male,” a secret experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service to study the progression of the deadly venereal disease-without treatment.

… The researchers never obtained informed consent from the men and never told the men with syphilis that they were not being treated, but were simply being watched until they died and their bodies examined for ravages of the disease.

… Although originally projected to last six months, the study extended for 40 years. “Local physicians asked to assist with study and not to treat men,” the Centers for Disease Control reported in a timeline of the experiment. “Decision was made to follow the men until death.”

… In 1945, according to the CDC timeline, penicillin was “accepted as treatment of choice for syphilis.” The U.S. Public Health Services created what they called “rapid treatment centers” to help men afflicted with syphilis — except the men in the Tuskegee study.

D.             Why is the State Cruel and Incompetent?

1.              Lack of market forces

a)              No competition

b)              Jobs Program, Hard to end the jobs, constituency created

c)              Success not a requirement

Hillary is Back

E.              Interview with Julia Gillard

1.              Former Prime Minister of Australia

2.              Labor Party

F.              Play video segments

G.             Claims in Interview

1.              Clinton:  “There is still a very large proportion of the population that is uneasy with women in positions of leadership.”

2.              Gillard:  “It just dismayed me that for you this ended up with chants of lock her up or string her up at republican rallies.  String her up.  It is like the Salem witch trials again.”

3.              LMV comments

a)              Clinton refuses to acknowledge the real reason she lost- she was a really awful candidate.  She wants to blame her loss on being a woman.  That had nothing to do with it.  She is no Margaret Thatcher.

b)              The law regarding sensitive high security government information does not state that you must have willful intent to misuse the data.  If you are CARELESS with the information you are guilty.  Anyone else would have been severely prosecuted under the law.

c)              Gillard is typical leftist, makes up “string her up” chant.

(1)            Youtube and google search turns up no such chant